March 4, 2011
I know this guy who runs a website called Bridge and Tunnel Club, which is sort of an all-encompassing resource on New York City and its environs. Because of the comprehensive nature of the site, it often comes up in the listings when people do their internet searches (hopefully on Bing). And so he made a different website called “bridgeandtunnelclub.com Search Referrers of the Day,” where he lists, analyzes and often answers various queries that get referred to his site. I happen to think it’s laugh out loud hilarious, but you all know how weird my sense of humor is.
For a fun Friday activity, let’s play the Prosperity Blog’s version of Search Referrers of the Day. Specifically, here are some of the most interesting ones we’ve gotten this week:
Read the rest of this entry »
February 25, 2011
Sometimes the Weekly “Controversial Proposal of the Week” feature here on the Prosperity Blog earns its name because I say something controversial (like when I said we might have too many economic development organizations in the region). Sometimes, it’s because I’m just referring to something that’s – in itself – controversial. Like a ripped from the headlines story like the big scandal in the news this week about the Seattle Public School and its Regional Small Business Development Program.
We don’t know what the ultimate consequences for the school district will be. But what we can know for certain is that this is going to be bad news for the minority owned business community. Read the rest of this entry »
October 8, 2010
Yes, that’s right. It’s time again for your weekly “Random Economic Development Email of the Week” or REDEW, where I share some of the strange things that come into my inbox and then riff on their relation to regional economic development. I know you’ve been waiting excitedly since last week’s debut. This week’s winner: an invitation to the 2010 Western Washington Diversity and Inclusion Conference and Awards! Read the rest of this entry »
January 21, 2010
As we all try to look ahead and see what the New Year has in store for this region’s economy there are some less visible but possibly more promising early signs of recovery. At the end of 2009 the Business and Economic Development Center celebrated the successes of small businesses from across the state at the 11th annual UW Minority Business of the Year Awards banquet. The 550+ attendees celebrated the incredible growth that minority-owned businesses have had in this state:
October 20, 2009
I was reading this article on Xconomy about their new partnership with the Kauffman Foundation, and the titular question immediately struck me: Why Don’t We Have a Kauffman Foundation?
Think about it: we are a center of innovation, but one of the most difficult places in the country to start and sustain a new business (see Indicator 13). And what do they focus on? Improving the success of entrepreneurship and commercialization! Read the rest of this entry »
August 7, 2009
PSBJ has a story about how “[m]inority-owned small businesses in Washington state and across the nation could be at greater risk of failure during the recession due to their limited access to credit, increased competition and overall weak sales.” Not a shocker, certainly. Running a business in a recession is hard. Running a small business in a recession is harder. And sadly, running a minority-owned small business is even worse. Read the rest of this entry »
December 31, 2008
So, I-200 (prohibiting the state from using race or ethnicity in deciding student admissions, employment or contract awards) has lots of detractors, particularly among the minority-owned business community. But this quote is really eye-opening:
“I-200 has impacted state agencies in a way that in some cases they are overly cautious about reaching out to diverse suppliers,” Cooper says. “There’s this atmosphere of ‘I’m not sure I can do this’ and that does not level the playing field. It does just the opposite.”
Essentially, state departments are saying, “It’s not worth the potential headache to hire certified minority-owned firms, so I’m not going to.” No wonder that less than 1% of state contracts go to MBOs.
The underlying question is, in a period where certification is a hinderance, is it worth getting certified? Certification gives a stamp of approval to companies to say that they are truly owned at least 51% by a minority (or woman) owner, and that’s great for corporate contracting where large corporations have a certain spend that they’re trying to get to with diverse businesses. In fact, I know that a lot of companies ask some of their minority-owned firms to get certified so that they can count them officially in their reporting. But for government, where departments are prohibited from factoring in race, getting certified apparently opens up a whole can of worms. If we’re going to ask MBOs to get certified, which is a time and money consuming process, we better make sure there’s value in it.